rethinking the law of armed conflict in an age of terrorism google

The re-emergence of public bigotry has nothing to do with technology, except to the extent that bigots use it to promote their malignant goals. But this can only happen in a society that can’t be bothered to protect liberty – or is easily led/stampeded into relinquishing it – and that is happening in more and more of the Western democracies. These systems will keep every citizen under observation 24 hours a day, seven days a week, monitoring their every action.”ĭan Gillmor, co-founder of the News Co/Lab at Arizona State University’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, and professor of practice in digital media literacy commented, “Governments (and their corporate partners) are broadly using technology to create a surveillance state, and what amounts to law by unaccountable black-box algorithm, far beyond anything Orwell imagined. They serve the goals of those in powerĪn internet pioneer and technology developer and administrator predicted, “My expectation is that by 2030, as much of 75% of the world’s population will be enslaved by artificial intelligence-based surveillance systems developed in China and exported around the world. Empowering the powerful: Corporate and government agendas generally do not serve democratic goals or achieve democratic outcomes.

These worries are organized under seven themes. This section includes comments about problems that were made by all respondents regardless of their answer to the main question about the impact of technology on democracy by 2030. About half of the experts responding to this canvassing said people’s uses of technology will mostly weaken core aspects of democracy and democratic representation, but even those who expressed optimism often voiced concerns.

Rethinking the law of armed conflict in an age of terrorism google